Such violence has been consistently condemned by the Anglican Communion worldwide.If this is taken as, 'Various provinces of the Anglican Communion around the world have opposed such violence,' all well and good. But this seems to me to parse too fine, and not sit so well with the Archbishop's habit of suggesting greater unity — on the basis of Lambeth Conference resolutions — than there is "on the ground.."
So while I warmly welcome the statement as a whole, that clause about the Communion, once again suggests the Archbishop's tendency to confuse statements on a piece of paper (even Lambeth Conference stationery) with "the 'mind' of the Anglican Communion." Just as there are provinces out of step to the left, there are those out of step to the right.
When will +Rowan learn that pretending to Unanimity — or even its stepsister Consensus — on conflicted matters is counterproductive? Better to acknowledge disagreements where they exist; as +Desmond showed us, truth comes before reconciliation. To do that and just say, plain and simple, and with all the authority that can be mustered, "I, as Archbishop of Canterbury, condemn this deplorable act." I, as Vicar of Fordham, am unanimous in that.
Tobias Stanislas Haller BSG
They've enabled the violence, even as they've Officially Condemned it.
ReplyDeleteThe former cancels out the latter, IMO.
The failure to see that "religious opposition" to same-sexuality derives from a non-rational homophobia is at the root of the problem. To read back at the Ugandan official statements is to see deeply irrational religious notions paraded as if simple facts.
ReplyDeleteBingo!
ReplyDelete