December 7, 2011

Maxim 20111207

Anyone unwilling to live with tension is unworthy of marriage.

Tobias Stanislas Haller BSG

13 comments:

  1. John-Julian, OJNDecember 07, 2011

    I've always enjoyed the definition: "Marriage is just something two people go through together."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anyone unwilling to live with tension is unworthy of life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks to both for further thought... T.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not so much unworthy of marriage, as incapable of it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Robert... that was my thought. Something best not attempted without a store of charity and a forgiving heart.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Marriages do end, of course, sometimes when one partner cannot possibly tolerate what the other one believes to be of no major consequence to their spouse.

    It is not wrong for those marriages to end.

    ReplyDelete
  7. True, Erika. Note that this maxim was really about the Anglican Covenant...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tension is like stress, to much for to long breaks things while trying to entirely avoid it destroys one's health.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Tobias,
    I know. And if some Provinces genuinely cannot cope with what others do, although it doesn't affect them at all, then the Anglican marriage has to end, whether it does so by means of objecting Provinces leaving or innocent spouses being kicked out.

    It would be a sad outcome but it could also be a liberating one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There's a wonderful line in an old Paul Simon song that goes "So goodbye, goodbye. I'm gonna leave you now, and here's the reason why: I like to sleep with the window open, and you keep the window closed, so goodbye, goodbye, goodbye."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks, Peter. I'll add that to my marriage counseling kit!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Comments on marriage frequently remind me of this Ogden Nash poem. In graduate school, we performed this set to Anglican chant.

    “We Don't Need to Leave Yet, Do We? Or, Yes We Do"

    One kind of person when catching a train always wants to allow an hour to cover the ten-block trip to the terminus,
    And the other kind looks at them as if they were verminous,
    And the second kind says that five minutes is plenty and will even leave one minute over for buying the tickets,
    And the first kind looks at them as if they had cerebral rickets.
    One kind when theater-bound sups lightly at six and hastens off to the play,
    And indeed I know one such person who is so such that it frequently arrives in time for the last act of the matinee,
    And the other kind sits down at eight to a meal that is positively sumptuous,
    Observing cynically that an eight-thirty curtain never rises till eight-forty, an observation which is less cynical than bumptious.
    And what the first kind, sitting uncomfortably in the waiting room while the train is made up in the yards, can never understand,
    Is the injustice of the second kind's reaching their scat just as the train moves out, just as they had planned,
    And what the second kind cannot understand as they stumble over the first kind's heel just as the footlights flash on at last
    Is that the first kind doesn't feel the least bit foolish at having entered the theater before the cast.
    Oh, the first kind always wants to start now and the second kind always wants to tarry,
    Which wouldn't make any difference, except that each other is what they always marry.”
    ― Ogden Nash

    ReplyDelete
  13. Excellent, Paul. Nash is an underestimated treasure.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome, but: I ask you to identify yourself, and to • avoid mere contradiction or assertion; give reasons for disagreement • stay with the topic of the post.
Your words are yours but I reserve the right to cite them or refer to them in other contexts.
I will not post comments that are irrelevant or offensive.
Note that Blogger limits comments to 4,096 characters.