Theology of the Body
When it comes to human embodiment, some appear to see the body as determinative and closed by intrinsic limits, while others see it as creative and open to possibilities.
Tobias Stanislas Haller BSG
The serious and sometimes satirical reflections of a priest, poet, and pilgrim —
who knowing he has not obtained the goal, presses on in a Godward direction.
“a clear-sighted companion.... If you are passionate about the vitality of today’s church, I encourage you to accompany him on his mystagogical excursion into the liturgical landscape. You will rediscover a familiar place rife with fresh provisions planted by the God who longs to feed our deepest hungers and hopes.” —Jay Koyle, chair, Faith, Worship and Ministry of The Anglican Church of Canada
Your words are yours but I reserve the right to cite them or refer to them in other contexts
I will not post comments that are irrelevant or offensive.Note that Blogger limits comments to 4,096 characters.
5 comments:
Says the genderqueer: THANK YOU!
Much of the so-called theology of the body I've read looks a lot lot like scriptural or magisterial fundamentalism. It reads a singular meaning or function into bodies, something that any observer of bodies quickly realizes is untenable.
Yr welcome, JCF.
Christopher, my sentiments exactly. It is a kind of narrow "literal" reading of text and nature: as if there could only be one meaning; when in fact the multiple readings, meanings, and possibilities are so plainly evident -- if only from the fact that disagreement exists!
Not sure what Theology of the Body you're responding to. If it's the appeal to function -- "Men and Women are made to fit together" -- it doesn't bear much thought. The clitoris notoriously is badly placed for the woman's pleasure in intercourse; whereas the male has a major sexual organ just inside the anus. The anus isn't made for sex? Do you reserve the penis for either sex or urination? Same-sex relations aren't natural? Zoologists have noted that most giraffes are queer (at least, most of the time). Some brands of "look for justifications for what you want to believe" are too obviously illogical. (Prooftexting gone wild.)
Murdoch, I was thinking explicitly of John Paul II's work of that name, though it is only one instance of a general tendency to idealize and idolize, even while misreading and misrepresening, the body.
Post a Comment